If you agree on these ideas help me to run them. If there is anything that does not convince you tell me.
First identify the tasks of the state, which are of two types: legislative tasks and operational tasks
Second compliments legislation is "exclusive" (a few) and "competing ", together with the Regions. Even these few.
Third : all other laws are the responsibility of the individual regions. Also in competition with each other. It is not "chaos", is competing to see who manages better, where the quality of life is better, which is attracting more investment and where there is more security and less thieves at large.
Fourth the operational tasks of the central government are very few. Include the management of public debt of the Republic, but not the management of welfare (LSU, disability, etc.).
Fifth the tasks of the State are valued at standard cost
Sixth : the tasks of the state are financed by one of two national taxes. The "tax to pay for services of the State"
Seventh the second national tax is the "tax equalization and for solidarity." The pay all the proceeds go to a "common pot". We calculate the average national per capita GDP. The regions that are exceeding not receive anything. Those which generate a GDP per capita below the national average shares of cashing "fee for the solidarity and equalization," provided that there is significant tax evasion and social security contributions
Eighth the calculation is not performed nominal values, but based on "purchasing power".
Ninth everything else, all other fees, are managed by the regions. Principle of tax competition between regions. As in Switzerland. Example of the canton of Obwalden: they have decided to switch to short the flat tax.
Tenth: in the regions where you decide to give so many services to residents (citizens, businesses, associations, etc.) the tax burden will be higher than the pressure in regions where the directors decide to provide fewer services.
There seems logical? Hello. Straw
0 comments:
Post a Comment